Board of National Correspondents
Axel Braun (Germany)
Matthew Brincat (Malta)
Pilar Cavero (Spain)
James Davies (England)
George Z. Georgiou (Cyprus)
Paul Glenfield (Ireland)
Jan Hofkens (Belgium)
André Istad Johansen (Norway)
Vibeke Jaggi (Switzerland)
Robert Lakatos (Sweden)
Carmo Sousa Machado (Portugal)
Effie Mitsopoulou (Greece)
Michel Molitor (Luxembourg)
Mariann Norrbom (Denmark)
Peter Vas Nunes (The Netherlands)
Gabriella Ormai (Hungary)
Natasa Randlova (Czech Republic)
Caterina Rucci (Italy)
Dorothé Smits (The Netherlands)
Kaj Swanljung (Finland)
Andreas Tinhofer (Austria)
Claire Toumieux (France)
Marek Wandzel (Poland)
Academic Editors
Eduardo González Biedma (Seville, Spain)
Niklas Bruun (Helsinki, Finland)
Luca Calcaterra (Naples, Italy)
Christian Clasen (Copenhagen, Denmark)
Stein Evju (Oslo, Norway)
Martin Henssler (Köln, Germany)
Petr Hůrka (Czech Republic)
Jean-Philippe Lhernould (Poitiers, France)
Jonas Malmberg (Uppsala, Sweden)
Beata Nacsa (Budapest, Hungary)
Martin Risak (Vienna, Austria)
Andrzej Swiatkowski (Kraków, Poland)
Evert Verhulp (The Netherlands)
Marc de Vos (Gent, Belgium)
General Editor
For further details please send an e-mail
eelc@sdu.nl
European Employment Law Cases (EELC)
Specialising in employment law jurisprudence from other EU-member states will have a positive influence on your case
All over Europe employment lawsuits are being fought and courts are delivering judgments on a daily basis. Lawyers tend to read only the judgments of their own country’s courts, and therefore as a rule remain unaware of how courts in other jurisdictions interpret and apply legal doctrines that are (more or less) common to all of Europe. To give but one small example, lawyers in The Netherlands are in need of guidance on what constitute technical, economic and organisational (ETO) reasons as provided in Article 4(1) of the Acquired Rights Directive 2001/23, on which question the ECJ has not yet pronounced usefully and on which there is very little Dutch precedent. Knowing that the courts in England and Wales have issued a fair number of judgments on ETO would surely be helpful for Dutch lawyers.
EELC is a new magazine with information on national judgments that are of interest to employment specialists in the European member states. The publication focuses on national judgments of EU member states but also contains brief references to recent ECJ cases.
Why you should read EELC :
- First and only Journal with summaries of European Employment Law Cases along with commentaries from the jurisdictions in question and comments from other jurisdictions
- Brief references to recent ECJ cases and conclusions
- This EELC website provides access to the (untranslated) full text of the judgments
The Board of National Correspondents currently consists of one employment law specialist in each of 22 EU member states (see column in the left). They are the magazine's eyes and ears for their respective jurisdictions and will notify the editors of any developments in their country which they feel should be shared with their foreign colleagues.
The Academic editors will see to the quality of the submissions and will add an overall perspective. This Academic Board currently consists of employment law professors and other university representatives from 14 jurisdictions.
Please join the "European Employment Lawyers" LinkedIn group to share your ideas
with us and other employment law specialists, and/or to expand your network.
Subscribe now!
Subscribe now and yearly you will receive:
- 6 editions of EELC
- access to the archives of EELC and full text judgments via www.idpeelc-online.com
- an e-mailnewsletter to announce the contents of the next edition
Subscription rate (1 year, 6 issues): € 350,-
For dutch subscribers 6% VAT will be added.
Click here to subscribe to EELC